<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Topology on Disentangled</title><link>/tags/topology/</link><description>Recent content in Topology on Disentangled</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><copyright>Copyright (c) 2020-2026 Thulite</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 16:04:48 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="/tags/topology/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Invariants</title><link>/articles/topology/knot-theory/invariants/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 16:04:48 +0200</pubDate><guid>/articles/topology/knot-theory/invariants/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A central problem in knot theory is determining when two knots, or more generally two links, are equivalent. Since a single knot or link can be represented in many different ways, mathematicians have introduced the notion of &lt;em&gt;invariants&lt;/em&gt;. These are numbers or polynomials associated to a knot or link that remain unchanged when the knot is deformed without being cut or passed through itself. In a sense, invariants function as fingerprints, allowing one to compare different representations of the same underlying topological object. If two links have different values of a given invariant, then they cannot possibly be equivalent.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>